If Ohio Eliminates Property Taxes… How Would We Pay for Everything?

🏫 What Do Property Taxes Currently Pay For in Ohio?

Property taxes are one of the main funding sources for public services and infrastructure such as:

• Public schools
• Police and fire departments
• Libraries
• Parks
• Roads and infrastructure
• Local government operations

Unlike some taxes that flow mostly through the state, property taxes are deeply tied to local communities, meaning different areas can have very different tax bills based on:

• local levies
• school district funding needs
• population growth
• property values

That’s why two homeowners with similar houses can have very different tax bills depending on the area.

---

💡 Why This Is Called “The Funding Question”

In economics, there’s a principle that basically says:

The cost doesn’t disappear — it shifts.

Eliminating a tax doesn’t automatically eliminate the cost of running government and public services. So if property taxes were eliminated, Ohio would likely need to do one (or more) of the following:

1. Replace the revenue
2. Reduce spending
3. Do a combination of both

---

🔁 Possible Ways Ohio Could Replace Property Tax Revenue

1) Higher Sales Tax

This is one of the most commonly discussed possibilities.

How it works:

Instead of funding services through property ownership, funding comes from spending.

Potential pros:

• Visitors and tourists contribute too
• Tax is spread across many purchases
• People “pay as they go” rather than one big annual bill

Potential cons:

• Sales tax can hit lower- and middle-income families harder
• It increases the cost of everyday living
• It could discourage spending or business activity

---

2) Higher Income Tax (State or Local)

Another possible replacement is increasing income taxes.

How it works:

Funding comes from what people earn rather than what they own.

Potential pros:

• Can be more closely tied to ability to pay
• Could be structured progressively (higher earners pay more)

Potential cons:

• Revenue becomes less predictable in recessions
• Higher rates may be unpopular
• Could affect job growth or business decisions long-term

---

3) New “Transaction Taxes” (Like Fees When You Sell a Home)

This is the one many homeowners worry about — and it’s worth discussing.

Instead of paying every year, you might pay when you:

• sell a home
• transfer property
• record deeds
• refinance

Potential pros:

• Homeowners wouldn’t pay annually
• Cost is tied to a major financial event (sale/transfer)

Potential cons:

• Could make moving much more expensive
• Could discourage selling suppressing for sale inventory even more
• Might reduce affordability for buyers if sellers pass costs through increasing their home values

---

4) Service Cuts or Consolidation

Some communities may not be able to replace all funding.

That could lead to:

• fewer school resources
• reduced staffing
• delayed infrastructure improvements
• consolidating services across jurisdictions

Potential pros:

• Smaller government footprint
• Reduced spending rather than replacing taxes

Potential cons:

• Quality of services may decline
• Could impact home values and neighborhood desirability
• May disproportionately affect certain communities

---

🏠 Why This Matters to Homeowners and Real Estate

From a real estate perspective, taxes and services are connected.

Buyers don’t just buy a house — they buy the surrounding ecosystem:

• schools
• safety
• roads
• community amenities

So even if eliminating property taxes lowers annual costs, homeowners may still want to consider:

• how replacement funding affects overall cost of living
• whether the community stays well-supported
• whether home values rise or fall based on the change

---

✅ My Takeaway

On the surface, eliminating property taxes in Ohio sounds like a win — and honestly, I get it. If you own a home, you already know how frustrating rising property taxes can be.

But here’s my takeaway: until advocates can show the math, homeowners should be cautious.

There’s no such thing as a free lunch. If Ohio eliminates property taxes, the revenue still has to come from somewhere — whether that’s higher sales tax, income tax, or new fees tied to homeownership. I’d love to see a clear plan for how the state would replace funding for schools, public safety, and local services without creating unintended consequences for taxpayers.

I’m open to reform, and even the idea of shifting some of the burden more broadly through local sales tax — but the key question is: how much would it need to increase to actually work?

Before Ohio voters support any major property tax change, we deserve transparency on what replaces it and what it means for homeowners long-term.